A preview of the Supreme Court’s new, highly anticipated term


MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

The U.S. Supreme Court starts a new term tomorrow. Because of the pandemic, this will be the first time in more than a year that the justices will be in the courtroom together – actually, all but one. Justice Brett Kavanaugh tested positive for COVID last week. And as a result, we are told he will take part in court proceedings remotely from his home. Still, there’s a menu of blockbuster cases that will come before the court this term. We wanted to hear more about that, so we called NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg.

Nina, thank you so much for joining us.

NINA TOTENBERG, BYLINE: My pleasure, Michel.

MARTIN: Nina, you know, there are a lot of high-profile cases being heard this term that could have major political implications. Why is that? Is this a coincidence?

TOTENBERG: No. These issues were deliberately selected by the court’s new conservative supermajority. Their goal is to chip away at or outright overrule nearly 50 years’ worth of abortion decisions, for instance. Or they want to expand other decisions, like those protecting gun rights and religious rights. Now, for the first time, since the appointment of Amy Coney Barrett, the court has six solidly conservative members. And it’s decided to put on the docket, front and center, some massive social issues that it has ducked in the past.

MARTIN: OK. But if the conservatives are sticking together to create the environment, to make decisions that conservatives want on issues like abortion, for example, doesn’t this make the court seem political?

TOTENBERG: You know, it’s a good question, Michel. The court’s reputation in two major polls has taken a big hit. A Gallup poll, for instance, found that public approval of the court performance slid to a new low of 40% including, quote, “less than a majority of Republicans, Democrats and independents.” Now, some of that happened after the court allowed a Texas law banning all abortions effectively after six weeks. And the court allowed that law to go into effect. And to counter some of this, some of the justices, both liberals and conservatives, have in recent speeches said that they’re not partisans. But there appears to be a growing divide on how they view their work and how the public views them and what they’re doing.

MARTIN: OK. So let’s talk about the big cases – the abortion, guns, religious rights. Could you just – as briefly as you can, what’s involved in these arguments?

TOTENBERG: Well, let’s start with abortion. On December 1, the court’s scheduled to hear arguments in a case testing a Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 weeks. That timeframe is a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade and subsequent decisions, which declared that women have a constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy up to the point when a fetus can survive outside the womb, usually at about 24 weeks.

Then there are guns. It’s the first gun case before the court in more than a decade. And it’s brought by gun owners against a New York law that requires a person who wants to carry a gun outside the home to get a special license, issued at the discretion of local authorities after a showing that there’s a proper cause or need for carrying the gun. New York turned down the gun owners in this case because it said they didn’t have a special need to carry weapons outside the home for self-defense. And we’re going to see whether the Supreme Court thinks one should have a right to carry weapons outside the home under the Constitution.

Religious rights – there’s a case for Maine involving particular restrictions on taxpayer aid to religious schools. Under the state law, Maine’s administrative districts, basically tiny towns, can contract with a nearby public school or private school to take their students, or the town can pay the tuition at a public or private school that the parent chooses. There’s just one exception. Tuition can only be paid to a nonsectarian school. The state says that’s in order to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not used to fund religious education.

MARTIN: Nina, before we let you go, we mentioned earlier that except for Justice Kavanaugh, who tested positive for COVID, this will be the first time in more than a year that at least eight of the justices will be in the courtroom together. Do you have a sense of what effect this might have on the proceedings?

TOTENBERG: Well, they’re going to go back to the usual free-for-all question and answer period and then, at the end, allow for extra-special questions in order of seniority. I don’t know if that’s going to mean that the arguments are incredibly long instead of the usual rigid format that ends them at a half an hour, typically. But I guess I’ll be able to tell you more after Monday.

MARTIN: All right, thank you. That’s NPR’s Nina Totenberg. Nina, thank you.

TOTENBERG: Thank you. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal Updates/News

Corruption a termite in every system: High court

Lucknow: The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court while refusing anticipatory bail to a government doctor, observed that corruption was a termite in every system and once it entered the system, it went on increasing. Rejecting the anticipatory bail of a government doctor, justice Krishna Pahal observed on February 25: “Corruption is a termite […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

SC Allows CBI to Probe 17-Year-Old Girl’s Death by Suicide in TN

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the CBI to proceed with the probe into the suicide of a 17-year-old girl in Thanjavur who was allegedly coerced to convert to Christianity. A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M Trivedi issued notice on the appeal filed by the Tamil Nadu DGP challenging the […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

SC Allows Future Retail to Move Delhi HC to Seek Resumption of NCLT Proceedings

The top court noted that the proceedings before the NCLT are at stage 8, meeting of shareholders, and that there are 15 stages for the final approval of the scheme. The top court granted liberty to Future Retail to move the high court seeking continuation of proceedings before NCLT beyond Stage 8. “Approach the Delhi […]

Read More