AP High Court Stays Arrest Of Man Booked For Posting Facebook Comment Against CM Jagan Reddy & Tribal Woman-MLA


The Andhra Pradesh High Court last week stayed the arrest of a man booked for allegedly posting a comment on Whatsapp group and Facebook against the Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy by resorting to morphing and thereby causing loss of reputation of a tribal woman MLA.

It was alleged that the petitioner, G. Veera Venkanna, made the comment in question to create a dispute between various groups, and therefore, a report was registered as a case for the offences punishable under Sections 153A, 505(2) r/w 34 IPC.

Staying probe in the matter and arrest of the petitioner in the case, the Bench of Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy observed thus:

“…the petitioner could make out a strong prima facie case warranting interference of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C to examine in the main Criminal Petition whether launching of criminal prosecution against the petitioner for the aforesaid two offences is legally sustainable or not and whether the said F.I.R is liable to be set aside or not.

Submissions made by the petitioner’s counsel

Advocate KM Krishna Reddy, the counsel for the petitioner argued that the contents of the FIR did not satisfy the ingredients of the offences both under Sections 153A and 505(2) IPC.

It was primarily contended that there was nothing to indicate in the FIR that any comment was made by the petitioner on the ground of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community with an intention to create ill-will between religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities. Therefore, he would submit that no case is made out under Section 153A IPC.

Similarly, it was contended that the contents of the FIR did not show that any such comment was made on the ground of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community with an intent to create any such ill-will between the said groups and therefore, even Section 505 (2) IPC was not attracted in the case.

Case title – G. Veera Venkanna, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Click here To Download Order

Read Order



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal Updates/News

Daughters to inherit self-acquired properties of fathers dying without a will: Supreme Court | Latest News India

The Supreme Court on Thursday said the daughters of a male Hindu dying without a will would be entitled to inherit self-acquired and other properties obtained in the partition by the father. The court also said that such daughters would get preference over other collateral members of the family such as sons and daughters of […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

Sameer Wankhede’s father files contempt plea against Nawab Malik in Bombay High Court

Dhyandev Wankhede, father of former Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) zonal director Sameer Wankhede, on Wednesday moved a contempt plea in the Bombay High Court, claiming that despite an undertaking given to the court last month, NCP Minister Nawab Malik continues to defame his family and has made contentious remarks on December 28, 2021, January 2 […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

Explained: The debate over marital rape

The Delhi High Court is hearing a challenge to the constitutional validity of the ‘marital rape immunity’ provided for in the Indian Penal Code. The case has put the spotlight on crucial issues concerning consent, the extent of state control on female sexual autonomy, and correcting historical prejudices in law. What is the case about? […]

Read More