Big issues going before the high court – Pasadena Star News


 

It’s wise to remember that you can’t believe everything you hear during a presidential campaign. However, when opposing candidates tell voters the next president’s appointees to the Supreme Court could shape the law for a generation, that can turn out to be true.

Over the course of the Supreme Court term that began this week, the justices will hear cases that could have a significant impact on the right to bear arms and on the power of states to restrict access to legal abortion, as well as many other important and controversial issues.

The abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, is a challenge to a 2018 Mississippi law that bans most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The law conflicts with the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which barred states from making abortion illegal before fetal viability, about 23 or 24 weeks.

Following the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett to succeed her, the court may have a five-vote majority to overturn Roe v. Wade. Chief Justice John Roberts, generally counted as a conservative, voted with the court’s liberal wing in a recent 5-4 ruling that declined to block a Texas abortion law from going into effect.

But it’s impossible to be certain how any justice will vote on any particular case. President Dwight Eisenhower was reported to have said, after he left the White House, “I have made two mistakes, and they are both sitting on the Supreme Court.” Historians dispute whether he said it, but not the underlying fact that Supreme Court justices, once confirmed, are not bound by views previously expressed.

The court will hear oral arguments in the Mississippi case on December 1. The public will be able to listen to live audio of the arguments, a pandemic-era accommodation that the court has decided to continue.

On November 3, the justices will hear a Second Amendment case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, that could determine whether states have the power to impose strict limits on carrying guns outside the home. The court ruled in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own a gun, shutting down the argument that the Constitution protects the right to own a firearm only in connection with service in a militia. However, the court turned away all subsequent cases related to the right to “bear” arms outside the home until Justice Barrett joined the court.

During this term, the justices will also hear a case from Maine on the question of whether a state may exclude a religious school that also provides secular education from a state tuition program, or whether that exclusion violates the religion clauses and the equal protection clause of the Constitution. Oral arguments in the case of Carson v. Makin are scheduled for December 8.

President Donald Trump’s three appointees to the court — Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — are considered likely to vote with longtime conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, creating a conservative majority that could shape the interpretation of the nation’s Constitution and laws for many years to come.

So you see, not everything that’s said during a campaign is untrue.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Legal Updates/News

Corruption a termite in every system: High court

Lucknow: The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court while refusing anticipatory bail to a government doctor, observed that corruption was a termite in every system and once it entered the system, it went on increasing. Rejecting the anticipatory bail of a government doctor, justice Krishna Pahal observed on February 25: “Corruption is a termite […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

SC Allows CBI to Probe 17-Year-Old Girl’s Death by Suicide in TN

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the CBI to proceed with the probe into the suicide of a 17-year-old girl in Thanjavur who was allegedly coerced to convert to Christianity. A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M Trivedi issued notice on the appeal filed by the Tamil Nadu DGP challenging the […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

SC Allows Future Retail to Move Delhi HC to Seek Resumption of NCLT Proceedings

The top court noted that the proceedings before the NCLT are at stage 8, meeting of shareholders, and that there are 15 stages for the final approval of the scheme. The top court granted liberty to Future Retail to move the high court seeking continuation of proceedings before NCLT beyond Stage 8. “Approach the Delhi […]

Read More