Ethanol group petitions US Supreme Court to look at E15 decision

The ethanol group Growth Energy has filed a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a ruling that vacated a 2019 EPA rule allowing year-round sales of E15 ethanol.

The District of Columbia Circuit Court decision overturned EPA’s interpretation of a provision of the Clean Air Act that extended a waiver of limits on Reid vapor pressure, or R, a measure of fuel volatility, to E15 or 15% ethanol fuel blend.

In an Oct. 4 news release, Growth Energy said it argues that the decision did not give proper deference to EPA, contradicted the intent of promoting renewable fuels. The group also says the decision will suppress the expansion of higher-blend renewable fuels in the future.

“In 2019, EPA paved the way for the sale of E15 year-round. Its decision was not only a win for the biofuels industry, our ag partners, and rural America, but for the environment and all drivers nationwide,” Growth Energy CEO Emily Skor said in a news release. “Low-carbon biofuels like ethanol burn cleaner and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 46% compared to gasoline. E15 is approved for use in 95% of cars on the road; Year round consumer access to this higher blend of biofuel will further decarbonize our current auto fleet. We are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review the D.C. Circuit’s decision to vacate year-round E15 because it is not in line with important court precedent on statutory interpretation and because of its detrimental environmental impacts.”

The case in question is American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al. vs. EPA, with an oil refining group challenging the use of year-round E15. Growth Energy participated as an intervenor in the case in support of the RVP rule.

On July 2, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the 2019 rule. On Aug. 16, Growth Energy, the Renewable Fuels Association, and the National Corn Growers Association filed a petition for rehearing with the D.C. Circuit, asking the three-judge panel and the full court to rehear the case. The appeals court denied that petition Sept. 9.

The Supreme Court hears very few of the cases sought by petitioners. Of the attorney-written petitions, or writ of certiorari, only about 6% are heard by the high court, according to the Supreme Court Press.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal Updates/News

Corruption a termite in every system: High court

Lucknow: The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court while refusing anticipatory bail to a government doctor, observed that corruption was a termite in every system and once it entered the system, it went on increasing. Rejecting the anticipatory bail of a government doctor, justice Krishna Pahal observed on February 25: “Corruption is a termite […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

SC Allows CBI to Probe 17-Year-Old Girl’s Death by Suicide in TN

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the CBI to proceed with the probe into the suicide of a 17-year-old girl in Thanjavur who was allegedly coerced to convert to Christianity. A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M Trivedi issued notice on the appeal filed by the Tamil Nadu DGP challenging the […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

SC Allows Future Retail to Move Delhi HC to Seek Resumption of NCLT Proceedings

The top court noted that the proceedings before the NCLT are at stage 8, meeting of shareholders, and that there are 15 stages for the final approval of the scheme. The top court granted liberty to Future Retail to move the high court seeking continuation of proceedings before NCLT beyond Stage 8. “Approach the Delhi […]

Read More