Kerala MLA Moves Supreme Court Against Kerala HC’s Refusal To Look Into Re-Opening Of Borders


A member of the Kerala Legislative Assembly has moved the Supreme Court challenging Kerala High Court’s refusal to entertain his petition challenging State of Karnataka’s decision to restrict entry of people from Kerala unless they possess a negative RTPCR test.

The special leave petition has been filed by AKM Ashraf challenging Kerala High Court’s order refusing to lift mandatory condition to possess a negative RT-PCR Certificate taken within 72 hours of travel, on grounds of lack of jurisdiction.

The writ petition before the High Court sought urgent orders to allow free movement of daily commuters of people of Kerala to Karnataka by lifting the mandatory condition to possess a negative RT-PCR Certificate taken within 72 hours of travel, irrespective of having taken at least one does of Covid Vaccine.

The petitioner challenged the following two orders before the Kerala High Court:

  • Order dated 31.07.2021 issued by the Chief Secretary, Government of Karnataka directing that for entry from Kerala to the State of Karnataka the travellers including students, professionals, business men who travel on a daily basis will have to undergo RTPCR test even if they are fully vaccinated.
  • Order of Deputy Commissioner directing to close the Kerala – Karnataka Border and to cancel the Government Transport buses seeking to pass through the said border.

According to the petitioner, the Kerala High Court’s decision to dismiss his petition for want of territorial Jurisdiction since impugned order was passed by the State of Karnataka is incorrect and the cause of action in the present matter is clearly within the State of Kerala, as effect of these two orders are felt gravely by the people of Kerala.

The petitioner has further submitted that the effect of these orders falls on the students and the public visiting the state every day for education, business, Job, medical treatment and other reasons have been asked to undergo a RT-PCR test which is practically impossible and makes no sense for daily commuters.

“The High Court under Art 226 (2) has ample jurisdiction to issue a Writ against any Government even if the seat of such Government is outside its territory. Therefore, the Kerala High Court had jurisdiction to issue a writ against the Government of Karnataka against the order dated 31.07.2021 passed by the Government of Karnataka”, the petitioner has argued.

The petitioner has also argued that Karnataka Government’s order is in conflict with the directions issued by the Central Government on 25th August directing State Governments, to not mandate RT-PCR test for fully vaccinated peoples to cross from one state to another.

Case Details: AKM Ashraf vs State of Karnataka & Ors



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Legal Updates/News

Corruption a termite in every system: High court

Lucknow: The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court while refusing anticipatory bail to a government doctor, observed that corruption was a termite in every system and once it entered the system, it went on increasing. Rejecting the anticipatory bail of a government doctor, justice Krishna Pahal observed on February 25: “Corruption is a termite […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

SC Allows CBI to Probe 17-Year-Old Girl’s Death by Suicide in TN

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the CBI to proceed with the probe into the suicide of a 17-year-old girl in Thanjavur who was allegedly coerced to convert to Christianity. A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M Trivedi issued notice on the appeal filed by the Tamil Nadu DGP challenging the […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

SC Allows Future Retail to Move Delhi HC to Seek Resumption of NCLT Proceedings

The top court noted that the proceedings before the NCLT are at stage 8, meeting of shareholders, and that there are 15 stages for the final approval of the scheme. The top court granted liberty to Future Retail to move the high court seeking continuation of proceedings before NCLT beyond Stage 8. “Approach the Delhi […]

Read More