Police investigate suspicious vehicle near Supreme Court


The United States Capitol Police said Tuesday that officers have a person in custody after investigating a suspicious vehicle in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., the second day of the high court’s new term.


What You Need To Know

  • Capitol Police confirmed Tuesday that a person is in custody after police investigated a suspicious vehicle in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.
  • The incident took place on the second day of the Supreme Court’s new term
  • Capitol Police have been on high alert about threats since the Jan. 6 insurrection, when a mob of supporters of then-President Donald Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to disrupt Congress’ certification of Joe Biden’s win in the 2020 presidential election
  • The court’s new term opened on Monday, and a number of high-profile cases are on the docket, including those related to abortion and guns

Authorities identified the man as Dale Paul Melvin from Kimball, Michigan. 

“This morning at about 9:30 am, a man pulled his SUV up in front of the Supreme Court,” the U.S. Capitol Police’s Deputy Chief of the Operational Services Bureau Jason Bell said at a press conference Tuesday afternoon. “It was illegally parked. Our officers then immediately responded. The man refused to talk, made a statement to the effect of ‘The time for talking is done.’”

“At that time, we backed off, had our crisis negotiation officers attempt to speak with them. The man was refusing to speak,” Bell continued. “And at approximately 11:00, our teams moved in and removed him from the vehicle and placed him under arrest.”

Bell said that “no weapons have been found” at this time, but noted that the crime scene is still active and the matter is still under investigation.

“It’s still an active investigation,” Bell said. “We don’t have motivation at this time.”

“I’d like to express my appreciation for all our officers, the supreme court officers,” Bell added. “Everybody did an outstanding job to keep the congressional campus safe today.”

Capitol Police have been on high alert about threats since the Jan. 6 insurrection, when a mob of supporters of then-President Donald Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to disrupt Congress’ certification of Joe Biden’s win in the 2020 presidential election.

The Supreme Court is hearing arguments on Tuesday in two criminal justice-related cases. The high court is hearing arguments in person for the first time since the COVID-19 pandemic. 

The court’s new term opened on Monday, and a number of high-profile cases are on the docket, including those related to abortion and guns.

This is a developing story. Check back later for further updates.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal Updates/News

Daughters to inherit self-acquired properties of fathers dying without a will: Supreme Court | Latest News India

The Supreme Court on Thursday said the daughters of a male Hindu dying without a will would be entitled to inherit self-acquired and other properties obtained in the partition by the father. The court also said that such daughters would get preference over other collateral members of the family such as sons and daughters of […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

Sameer Wankhede’s father files contempt plea against Nawab Malik in Bombay High Court

Dhyandev Wankhede, father of former Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) zonal director Sameer Wankhede, on Wednesday moved a contempt plea in the Bombay High Court, claiming that despite an undertaking given to the court last month, NCP Minister Nawab Malik continues to defame his family and has made contentious remarks on December 28, 2021, January 2 […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

Explained: The debate over marital rape

The Delhi High Court is hearing a challenge to the constitutional validity of the ‘marital rape immunity’ provided for in the Indian Penal Code. The case has put the spotlight on crucial issues concerning consent, the extent of state control on female sexual autonomy, and correcting historical prejudices in law. What is the case about? […]

Read More