Prosecutors ask Supreme Court to review the Bill Cosby case : NPR


Attorney Jennifer Bonjean, Bill Cosby, and spokesperson Andrew Wyatt speaking outside of Cosby’s suburban Philadelphia home in June, after the actor was released from prison.

Michael Abbott/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Michael Abbott/Getty Images

Attorney Jennifer Bonjean, Bill Cosby, and spokesperson Andrew Wyatt speaking outside of Cosby’s suburban Philadelphia home in June, after the actor was released from prison.

Michael Abbott/Getty Images

Prosecutors in Montgomery County, Pa. are appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court to review a state high court decision that allowed comedian and actor Bill Cosby to walk free less than three years after he was convicted of assaulting a woman in a high-profile #MeToo case.

Cosby’s indecent assault conviction in April 2018 was overturned last June, after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the actor’s due process rights had been violated.

He had been charged for an alleged 2004 assault against Andrea Constand, who had been working for the women’s basketball team at Temple University in Philadelphia, after prosecutors had told him that they wouldn’t bring criminal charges against him. At the time the ruling was overturned, Cosby had served more than two years of a scheduled three- to 10-year sentence.

In his appeal to the state Supreme Court, Cosby argued that a statement made by then-district attorney Bruce L. Castor Jr. in 2005 promised Cosby would not face criminal charges stemming from Constand’s allegations that Cosby had drugged and sexually assaulted her at his home.

Castor has said that he told Cosby’s lawyer verbally that he would not prosecute the actor and comedian, and that he then issued a press release announcing that his office’s criminal investigation had concluded. In court, Castor testified that he took those measures in an attempt to get Cosby to testify in any civil suit filed by Costand. In its June ruling, the state Supreme Court found that non-prosecution agreement binding.

In a press release Monday, Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin R. Steele said the Pennsylviania Supreme Court’s decision could set a precedent that “prosecutors’ statements in press releases now seemingly create immunity.”

“This decision as it stands will have far-reaching negative consequences beyond Montgomery County and Pennsylvania,” Steele said. “The U.S. Supreme Court can right what we believe is a grievous wrong.”

In a statement sent to NPR, Cosby spokesperson Andrew V. Wyatt argued that the Montgomery County D.A. is asking the nation’s highest court to “throw the Constitution out the window, as it did, to satisfy the #metoo mob.”

“This is a pathetic last-ditch effort that will not prevail,” he wrote, adding that Steele’s “fixation with Mr. Cosby is troubling to say the least.”

According to the official U.S. Courts website, the Supreme Court is asked to review more than 7,000 cases per year, and only hears about 100 to 150 appeals each year.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal Updates/News

Illegally recorded tapes can’t be evidence, says Delhi high court | Delhi News

NEW DELHI: The Delhi HC has held that permitting illegally intercepted messages and audio conversations as evidence, without any sanction, will lead to manifest arbitrariness and promote scant regard for the procedure and fundamental rights of the citizens. Such recordings are not admissible as evidence in courts, the HC said, while setting aside an order […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

Do not delay filing of supplementary challan: Punjab and Haryana High Court tells police

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the DGPs (Directors General of Police) of Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh to ensure that the filing of supplementary challan against an accused is not deferred for a long period on account of pendency of an anticipatory bail application. The Bench of Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill passed the […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

UP Election 2022: ‘Jaan hai toh jahan hai’: Allahabad high court cites Omicron, asks EC, PM to consider deferring UP polls | Allahabad News

PRAYAGRAJ: The Allahabad high court has requested the Election Commission of India, and the Prime Minister, to consider postponing the assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh, slated to be held in February next year, by a month or two in view of the sudden rise in the number of Covid-19 cases caused by the Omicron variant. […]

Read More