SC agrees to hear CBI’s plea against anticipatory bail granted to four


New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear the CBI’s plea challenging the Kerala High Court order granting anticipatory bail to four persons, including a former Director-General of Police (DGP), in connection with the 1994 ISRO espionage case relating to the alleged framing of scientist Nambi Narayanan.

The plea came up for hearing before a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar and C T Ravikumar which issued notice on the petition and posted it for hearing on November 29.

The high court on August 13 granted anticipatory bail to four accused – the former Gujarat DGP, two former police officers of Kerala, and a retired intelligence official – in connection with the case.

Those who were granted anticipatory bail by the high court were – R B Sreekumar (former DGP of Gujarat), Vijayan, Thampi S Durga Dutt, and P S Jayaprakash.

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S V Raju, appearing for the CBI, told the apex court that a grant of anticipatory bail might derail the investigation in the case.

Referring to the details, he said CBI has found in its probe that some scientists were tortured and framed in the matter due to which development of the cryogenic engine was hit and this led to India’s space programme going back by almost one or two decades.

We (CBI) are proceeding on the line that the technology for the cryogenic engine was deliberately tried to be stalled by arresting the scientists, who were involved in the development of the engine, as a result of which our space programme went back by at least one or two decades, Raju told the bench.

He said this is a very serious matter and there may be a larger conspiracy at the behest of foreign hands which is being investigated.

We are issuing notice, the bench said and posted the matter for hearing on November 29.

As the bench said it was issuing notice on the plea, the ASG said, May I request a stay of the order.

Where is the question of stay? we are issuing notice and taking it on November 29, the bench observed.

The investigating agency had earlier alleged that there was a clear indication that the accused were part of a team, which had ulterior motives to torpedo the attempts of the ISRO for manufacturing the cryogenic engine.

While granting anticipatory bail to these persons, the high court had said, “There is not even a scintilla of evidence regarding the petitioners being influenced by any foreign power so as to induce them to hatch a conspiracy to falsely implicate the scientists of the ISRO with the intention to stall the activities of the ISRO with regard to the development of the cryogenic engine.”

It had said unless there are specific materials regarding their involvement, prima facie, it cannot be said that they were acting against the interests of the country.

The CBI has registered a case against 18 persons for various alleged offences, including criminal conspiracy, in connection with the arrest and detention of former ISRO scientist Nambi Narayanan in the espionage case.

The case, which had hit the headlines in 1994, pertained to allegations of transfer of certain confidential documents on India’s space programme to foreign countries by two scientists and four others, including two Maldivian women.

Narayanan, who was given a clean chit by the CBI, had earlier said that the Kerala police had “fabricated” the case and the technology he was accused to have stolen and sold in the 1994 case did not even exist at that time.

The CBI, in its probe, had said that the then top police officials in Kerala were responsible for Narayanan’s illegal arrest.

The apex court had on September 14, 2018, appointed a three-member committee, while directing the Kerala government to cough up Rs 50 lakh compensation for compelling Narayanan to undergo “immense humiliation”.

Terming the police action against the ex-scientist of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) as a “psycho-pathological treatment”, the apex court had in September 2018 said that his “liberty and dignity”, basic to his human rights, were jeopardised as he was taken into custody and, eventually, despite all the glory of the past, was compelled to face “cynical abhorrence”.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal Updates/News

Venezuela’s High Court Retroactively Disqualifies Candidate

A Venezuelan opposition candidate who has been leading in vote count in the governor’s race for the home state of the late President Hugo Chávez has been retroactively disqualified by the country’s highest court more than a week after the election was held. The disqualification is likely to raise further doubts about the fairness of […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

Prosecutors ask Supreme Court to review the Bill Cosby case : NPR

Attorney Jennifer Bonjean, Bill Cosby, and spokesperson Andrew Wyatt speaking outside of Cosby’s suburban Philadelphia home in June, after the actor was released from prison. Michael Abbott/Getty Images hide caption toggle caption Michael Abbott/Getty Images Attorney Jennifer Bonjean, Bill Cosby, and spokesperson Andrew Wyatt speaking outside of Cosby’s suburban Philadelphia home in June, after the […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

ACLU Asks US Supreme Court to Review Status of Georgia Death Row Prisoner with Intellectual Disability

By Amy Berberyan WASHINGTON, DC — The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is asking for the U.S. Supreme Court to review Rodney Young’s status on Georgia’s death row, in a filing made earlier this week. According to the ACLU, “the petition on [Young’s] behalf seeks review of a Georgia law that requires persons with intellectual […]

Read More