Zee board rejects investor call for shareholders’ meet


MUMBAI: The Zee Entertainment Enterprises’ board declined largest shareholder Invesco’s request for a special shareholders’ meet to remove MD Punit Goenka from the company, citing the requisition to be “invalid and illegal”.
The development intensifies the battle between the US fund and the board of Zee, in which Invesco holds about 18%. The board’s decision comes a day after the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) directed it to consider Invesco’s request to hold an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) to remove Goenka and appoint multiple independent directors.
On Friday, Zee said its board decided not to hold an EGM because Invesco’s demand suffered from multiple legal infirmities. “The board has arrived at this decision by referring to various non-compliances under multiple laws… after taking into account the interests of all the company’s shareholders.”
Zee said the board’s decision was based on the legal advice it received from experts, including retired Supreme Court judges. The seven-member board comprises one non-independent director (Goenka) and six independent directors. Since Goenka was an interested party, he did not participate in Friday’s board meeting, the company said.
Zee will submit the board’s reply to the petition filed by Invesco in NCLT, which will hear the matter on October 4. Explaining the reasons for rejecting Invesco’s request, Zee said, the US fund’s proposal to appoint 50% of the company’s board would result in “it effecting a change in control of the company without making an open offer”.
However, a lawyer said Invesco has sought the appointment of “independent directors” on Zee board and “not their nominee directors”, raising doubts whether this would tantamount to change in control. Besides, according to Invesco’s governing guidelines, the US fund cannot hold more than 20% in any stock, which means it cannot make an open offer.
Zee further said that its Articles of Association (AoA) does not allow more than 12 directors on the board. Since the proposal to remove Goenka cannot be legally effectuated, and the proposal to appoint six independent directors are effected, the Zee board would consist of 13 members, which would be contrary to its (AoA), it said. Zee also said that the I&B ministry requires that to effect any change in the CEO and the board of a company their permission needs to be taken in advance.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal Updates/News

US high court won’t block vaccines for Maine health workers | State News

PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to block a vaccine requirement imposed on Maine health care workers, the latest defeat for opponents of vaccine mandates. It was the first time the Supreme Court weighed in on a statewide vaccine mandate. It previously rejected challenges of vaccine requirements for New York City […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

Do unbiased jurors exist in an age of social media?

Jury selection that began on Oct. 18, 2021, in the trial of three men accused of murdering unarmed Black jogger Ahmaud Arbery has been, according to an NPR report, a “very painstaking process.” That’s because it’s been hard to find jurors who have not been exposed to media reports of Arbery’s death or a graphic […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

US high court won’t block vaccines for Maine health workers

PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to block a vaccine requirement imposed on Maine health care workers, the latest defeat for opponents of vaccine mandates. It was the first time the Supreme Court weighed in on a statewide vaccine mandate. It previously rejected challenges of vaccine requirements for New York City […]

Read More