Attorney in New York, United States of America

Category:-General Practice Attorneys in New York, USA

Name:- Stull Stull & Brody

Address:- 6 E 45th St Fl 5New York, NY 10017

Phone:-(212) 687-7230

Website:- http://ssbny.com/

Email:- http://ssbny.com/

Description:- Over the past 30 years, Stull, Stull & Brody has developed a national reputation representing plaintiffs in securities class actions. Stull, Stull & Brody has litigated hundreds of securities cases obtaining nearly a billion dollars in settlements for aggrieved shareholders. Stull, Stull & Brody has also represented claimants in numerous class actions alleging violations of ERISA. With 15 attorneys and a full complement of secretarial and administrative personnel, Stull, Stull & Brody is capable of effectively prosecuting all types of complex litigation. Our lawyers possess outstanding credentials and have repeatedly been acknowledged for their achievements. Stull, Stull & Brody has been recognized by numerous Courts for the high quality of its legal representation and for its excellence in the field of securities as evidenced by the following comments of judges in cases where Stull, Stull & Brody has taken a leading role: [ T ] his is one of the largest, if not the largest, securities fraud settlements in this district. The settlement size is particularly noteworthy as class counsel did not have the benefit of an SEC or other regulatory agency investigation and so prosecuted the case without assistance…. The management of the case was also of extremely high quality…. [ C ] lass counsel is of high caliber and has extensive experience in similar class action litigation. Each of the co-lead counsel firms has a national reputation for advocacy in securities class actions, and there is no doubt that this standing enhanced their ability to prosecute the case effectively and to negotiate credibly…. The submissions were of consistently high quality, and class counsel has been notably diligent in preparing filing in a timely manner even when under tight deadlines. In re Ikon Office Solutions, Inc Securities Litigation, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6510 (E.D. Pa. May 9, 2000). I am satisfied that counsel in this case are highly competent, very skilled in this very specialized area and were at all times during the course of the litigation… well prepared, well spoken, [ ] knew their stuff and [ ] were a credit to their profession. They are the top of the line. In Re Electro-Catheter Corporation Securities Litigation, Civ. No. 87-41 (D.N.J. September 7, 1989). The court takes note of the competence of both plaintiffs= counsel and defendants= counsel and their extensive experience in litigating securities class actions. The competence of plaintiffs= counsel resulted in this case being vigorously and efficiently prosecuted against very able opponents over a twenty month period and was a factor in bringing about settlement. Schaffer v. Timberland Co., 94-634-JD (D.N.H. 1997). This case is a A model for how commercial litigation should be conducted and can be resolved.@ Bash v. Diagnostek, CV 94-794 M (D.N.M.). Indeed, I indicate to…counsel for plaintiff that they have done an admirable job in this case in bringing it to finality and in bringing back to the shareholders of this corporation some moneys [ sic ] as a result of certain things which occurred during the course of the operation of this corporation which perhaps should not have occurred. Finkel v. O’Brien, Civ. No. 85-2539 (D.N.J. March 27, 1990). All the firms involved in this litigation are highly experienced and well respected, particularly in the field of securities law litigation. The Stull… firm [ is one ] of this area’s, if not the nation’s most active and successful law firms specializing in securities litigation. Stull v. Baker, 410 F.Supp. 1326, 1332 (S.D.N.Y. 1976) Stull, Stull & Brody’s expertise in the field of securities litigation has also been recognized by the following courts: In re Frontier Group Insurance, Inc Securities Litigation, 172 F.R.D. 31 (E.D.N.Y. 1997); In re Allegheny International Inc. Shareholder Litigation, 86-835 (W.D. Pa.) (Order, December 10, 1987, Diamond J.); Zucker v. United States Steel, C-1-79-588 (S.D. Ohio) (Order, October 14, 1981, Ru

More Information:-

General Info
Over the past 30 years, Stull, Stull & Brody has developed a national reputation representing plaintiffs in securities class actions. Stull, Stull & Brody has litigated hundreds of securities cases obtaining nearly a billion dollars in settlements for aggrieved shareholders. Stull, Stull & Brody has also represented claimants in numerous class actions alleging violations of ERISA. With 15 attorneys and a full complement of secretarial and administrative personnel, Stull, Stull & Brody is capable of effectively prosecuting all types of complex litigation. Our lawyers possess outstanding credentials and have repeatedly been acknowledged for their achievements. Stull, Stull & Brody has been recognized by numerous Courts for the high quality of its legal representation and for its excellence in the field of securities as evidenced by the following comments of judges in cases where Stull, Stull & Brody has taken a leading role: [ T ] his is one of the largest, if not the largest, securities fraud settlements in this district. The settlement size is particularly noteworthy as class counsel did not have the benefit of an SEC or other regulatory agency investigation and so prosecuted the case without assistance…. The management of the case was also of extremely high quality…. [ C ] lass counsel is of high caliber and has extensive experience in similar class action litigation. Each of the co-lead counsel firms has a national reputation for advocacy in securities class actions, and there is no doubt that this standing enhanced their ability to prosecute the case effectively and to negotiate credibly…. The submissions were of consistently high quality, and class counsel has been notably diligent in preparing filing in a timely manner even when under tight deadlines. In re Ikon Office Solutions, Inc Securities Litigation, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6510 (E.D. Pa. May 9, 2000). I am satisfied that counsel in this case are highly competent, very skilled in this very specialized area and were at all times during the course of the litigation… well prepared, well spoken, [ ] knew their stuff and [ ] were a credit to their profession. They are the top of the line. In Re Electro-Catheter Corporation Securities Litigation, Civ. No. 87-41 (D.N.J. September 7, 1989). The court takes note of the competence of both plaintiffs= counsel and defendants= counsel and their extensive experience in litigating securities class actions. The competence of plaintiffs= counsel resulted in this case being vigorously and efficiently prosecuted against very able opponents over a twenty month period and was a factor in bringing about settlement. Schaffer v. Timberland Co., 94-634-JD (D.N.H. 1997). This case is a A model for how commercial litigation should be conducted and can be resolved.@ Bash v. Diagnostek, CV 94-794 M (D.N.M.). Indeed, I indicate to…counsel for plaintiff that they have done an admirable job in this case in bringing it to finality and in bringing back to the shareholders of this corporation some moneys [ sic ] as a result of certain things which occurred during the course of the operation of this corporation which perhaps should not have occurred. Finkel v. O’Brien, Civ. No. 85-2539 (D.N.J. March 27, 1990). All the firms involved in this litigation are highly experienced and well respected, particularly in the field of securities law litigation. The Stull… firm [ is one ] of this area’s, if not the nation’s most active and successful law firms specializing in securities litigation. Stull v. Baker, 410 F.Supp. 1326, 1332 (S.D.N.Y. 1976) Stull, Stull & Brody’s expertise in the field of securities litigation has also been recognized by the following courts: In re Frontier Group Insurance, Inc Securities Litigation, 172 F.R.D. 31 (E.D.N.Y. 1997); In re Allegheny International Inc. Shareholder Litigation, 86-835 (W.D. Pa.) (Order, December 10, 1987, Diamond J.); Zucker v. United States Steel, C-1-79-588 (S.D. Ohio) (Order, October 14, 1981, Ru
Email
Email Business
Extra Phones
TollFree: (800) 337-4983
Neighborhoods
Midtown East, Midtown Manhattan
AKA
Richard J Stull Atty
Robert A Stull Atty
Other Link
http://ssbny.com
Other Email
Email Business
Categories
Attorneys, General Practice Attorneys