Clubbing of PCS (EB) vacancies illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court : The Tribune India


Saurabh Malik

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, October 19

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that the Punjab Chief Secretary, Secretary, Department of Personnel, Financial Commissioner-Revenue (FCR) and the Legal Remembrancer (LR) acted contrary to the ambit and scope of the Punjab Civil Services (Executive Branch) (Class-I) Rules in filling up the Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) vacancies.

The admonition came as Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu ruled that clubbing of vacancies of two years — 2013 and 2014 — was legally impermissible and illegal. “Their actions are indefensible in law, being violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution,” Justice Sindhu asserted, adding that the panel/list of the eligible candidates for selection/ promotion was to be sent year-wise.

Justice Sindhu was hearing petitions by Balwinderpal Singh and other petitioner through senior advocates Rajiv Atma Ram and DS Patwalia, along with BS Patwalia, Vivek Sharma and Jatinder Pal Singh. Working as District Revenue Officers, they had challenged the non-inclusion of their names in Register A-1 maintained by the Chief Secretary for appointment to the posts.

Justice Sindhu observed the Department of Personnel, vide letter dated January 3, 2014, asked the FCR to send a panel/list of 27 eligible candidates against nine vacancies for 2013. The cut-off date for ascertaining age and experience was specifically mentioned as November 1, 2013.

The list and complete service record was to be sent by January 15, 2014, but was ultimately sent on May 25, 2015, after four reminders. The department, instead of forwarding the list, preferred to seek the opinion from the LR following the delay. It, vide an impugned corrigendum dated August 26, 2015, asked the FCR to send a panel/list of 30 eligible candidates against 10 vacancies on the premise that one more vacancy for 2014 had become available following delay. Justice Sindhu added the LR completely misunderstood the date of process initiation and the Chief Secretary did not care to consider the matter’s gravity and, rather in routine, approved the opinion.

The Bench quashed the impugned corrigendum, the second panel/list dated September 11, 2015, and the Punjab Public Service Commission recommendations dated February 8, 2016.

26 posts vacant

No less than 26 more vacancies have accumulated from Register A-1 due to pendency of the present writ petitions. Following interim stay in the matters, appointments were not made on the basis of recommendations dated February 8, 2016.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Legal Updates/News

Corruption a termite in every system: High court

Lucknow: The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court while refusing anticipatory bail to a government doctor, observed that corruption was a termite in every system and once it entered the system, it went on increasing. Rejecting the anticipatory bail of a government doctor, justice Krishna Pahal observed on February 25: “Corruption is a termite […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

SC Allows CBI to Probe 17-Year-Old Girl’s Death by Suicide in TN

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the CBI to proceed with the probe into the suicide of a 17-year-old girl in Thanjavur who was allegedly coerced to convert to Christianity. A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M Trivedi issued notice on the appeal filed by the Tamil Nadu DGP challenging the […]

Read More
Legal Updates/News

SC Allows Future Retail to Move Delhi HC to Seek Resumption of NCLT Proceedings

The top court noted that the proceedings before the NCLT are at stage 8, meeting of shareholders, and that there are 15 stages for the final approval of the scheme. The top court granted liberty to Future Retail to move the high court seeking continuation of proceedings before NCLT beyond Stage 8. “Approach the Delhi […]

Read More